Venezuela: Crisis of Identity and Institutional Legitimacy Since 1999

 􊳂􊳃

Venezuela: Crisis of Identity and Institutional Legitimacy Since 1999

4 sources

This text details a presentation by Rómulo Lares Sánchez for the Pío Tamayo Chair at the Central University of Venezuela, which critically examines the country's institutional crisis since 1999. The author argues that the current government is a "Régimen de Ocupación" (Occupation Regime) facilitated by international criminal organizations and domestic traitors who dismantled the 1961 Constitution through fraudulent electoral processes. By exploring themes of social control, media censorship, and judicial manipulation, the source challenges the official narrative of a satisfied populace and instead describes a nation suffering from an identity crisis and systematic destruction. The proposal advocates for a return to legitimate constitutional foundations while suggesting that the global technological revolution and Spanish democratic transitions provide vital frameworks for recovery. Ultimately, the document serves as a call for international military and police cooperation to purge organized crime and restore the Republic's sovereignty and civic dignity.

How has the 1999 constitutional transition impacted Venezuela's institutional legitimacy and social identity?

What role does international organized crime play in Venezuela's current regime of occupation?

Can historical parallels with Spain's transition help restore democracy and freedom in Venezuela?

Saturday, January 3

How has Venezuelan sovereignty and national identity been fundamentally compromised since 1999?

Venezuelan sovereignty and national identity have been fundamentally compromised since 1999 primarily through the establishment of a Régimen de Ocupación (RO), the destruction of constitutional and institutional legitimacy, and the systematic erosion of citizenship and civil liberties.

Compromise of Venezuelan Sovereignty

The sources describe the profound compromise of sovereignty through the systematic destruction of the state apparatus, institutions, and the fundamental legal structure of the Republic:

1. Institutional Destruction and Fraudulent Constitution: The foundation for coexistence in Venezuelan society, the "Social Pact" based on the Constitution of 1961, was allegedly destroyed through a series of frauds in 1999 aimed at proclaiming a false "Constitution". This arbitrary imposition led to the progressive and systematic destruction of public institutions, the state, and the rule of law. The resulting political framework is characterized by empty institutionalities and facades of the state and law.

2. Establishment of a Régime of Occupation (RO): Venezuela is described as having been progressively invaded and systematically destroyed since 1999, finding itself submitted to a Régimen de Ocupación (RO). This regime is formed by national traitors and the Crimen Organizado Transnacional (COT). The RO controls all national, state, and municipal public powers and institutions.

3. Foreign Control and Involvement of Transnational Organized Crime: The RO is supported by a mix of foreign nation-states (Russia, China, Iran) and terrorist organizations (ELN, ETA, FARC, Hezbollah). The operations of the RO are allegedly administered directly by Cuban bureaucracy, which controls critical areas such as customs, borders, identity, passports, public property registries, tax collection, and the disposition of the entire state apparatus, including diplomatic representations and corporations like PDVSA.

4. Military and Judicial Collapse: The Venezuelan Armed Forces (FFAANN), described as the "Constitutional Police," have allegedly dishonored their command structure and been transformed into a center for the production and coordination of transnational organized crime, involving crimes ranging from embezzlement and conspiracy to large-scale money laundering and treason. The judicial system has been neutralized, and judicial actors are subjected to cruel acts and public messages intended to instill terror, ensuring the entire legal process is conducted outside the rule of law.

Compromise of National Identity (Gentilicio)

The compromise of Venezuelan national identity, referred to as gentilicio, is linked to the state's total control over the population, migration, and information:

1. Sequestration of Identity and Citizenship: The initial action of the Occupation involved taking absolute control over the identity and nationality of Venezuelans and residents, managed exclusively by Cuban personnel. The identity and gentilicio of Venezuelans have been progressively lost due to manipulation of the Civil Registry and migration controls under the administration of Cuban bureaucrats. The control over identity is used to promote false Venezuelan citizens through a clandestine "industry".

2. Suppression of Civil Liberties and Censorship: Civil liberties have progressively disappeared since 1999. Free media have been censured, closed, or assaulted, unifying information and opinion produced by the state. Independent critics and journalists have been discriminated against, persecuted, tortured, or assassinated for expressing differing opinions, leading to the disappearance of debate and the establishment of censorship as the "Natural State".

3. System of Control and Apartheid: The RO quickly established population control to administer a system of "Apartheid," distributing rewards or punishments based on obedience to official lines. This involves maintaining lists of citizens based on electoral preferences (since the secrecy of the vote has disappeared) to administer privileges (e.g., jobs, services, access to foreign currency) or castigation. Collaborators ("enchufados") receive protection and privileges from the RO, contributing to its longevity.

4. Mass Displacement and "Holocaust": The period has been characterized by progressive and simultaneous stages of Apartheid, Genocide, Displacement (Exile, Escape, Emigration, Diaspora),

and Holocaust in the 21st century. The documented migration/displacement ("Diáspora") has resulted in the exodus of over 20% of the population, leading to Venezuela being classified as a "failed state". The state's manipulation of identities is even alleged to be part of a program to seed terrorism for a global invasion, intended to progressively destroy other nations, particularly the US.

What is the Cátedra “Pío Tamayo” focus?

The focus of the Cátedra “Pío Tamayo” (CPT), which operates within the CEHA/IIES/FACES/UCV institutions, is primarily centered on analyzing and debating the profound crisis in Venezuelan society and institutions that began in 1999.

The central theme for its academic sessions is articulated as the question: "¿La Venezuela Actual demuestra ser un pueblo satisfecho, alegre y feliz, o vive una crisis de identidad y legitimidad institucional desde 1999?" (Does current Venezuela prove to be a satisfied, joyful, and happy people, or is it living through a crisis of identity and institutional legitimacy since 1999?).

Key aspects of the CPT's focus include:

1. Analysis of Social and Legal Crisis (Part I): Evaluating how the attributes of satisfaction, joy, and happiness are perceived in contemporary Venezuela, often contrasting them with the documented evidence of a social and legal crisis that originated from the political changes of 1999. This includes documenting the systematic and progressive destruction of public institutionality, citizenship, and individual liberties in Venezuela since 2004-2005.

2. Restoration of the Republic (Part II): Promoting the development of strategies and intellectual tools to understand the current situation and guide the collective creation of a new proposal for life. This proposal emphasizes the non-negotiable principle of establishing formal, transparent, and auditable institutions that would restore the State, the Rule of Law, and the national identity (gentilicio).

3. Investigating the Régimen de Ocupación (RO): The CPT focuses on interpreting the current reality in Venezuela, which is described as being under a Régimen de Ocupación (RO) composed of national traitors and Transnational Organized Crime (COT). The CPT’s previous research contributed to documenting this occupation through a Doctoral Thesis Project titled: "Venezuela: Historia de un Engaño (1999-2008)".

4. Incorporating Global and Historical Contexts: To stimulate debate, the CPT proposes exploring modern challenges related to the technological revolution (AI, quantum physics) and the changing geopolitical landscape involving "Big States" and "Mega Technological Corporations". It also suggests drawing historical guidance from Spain's recent transition to democracy under King Juan Carlos I to inspire solutions for Venezuela's restoration.

5. Combating Censorship and Promoting Debate: The overall purpose of the reflection proposed by the CPT is to stimulate "thinking and debating" on these issues, especially since free media and debate have progressively disappeared in Venezuela since 1999, replaced by censorship as the "Natural State".

Discuss Regime of Occupation.

The Régimen de Ocupación (RO) is a central concept used in the sources to describe the current state of Venezuela, asserting that the country has been progressively invaded and systematically destroyed since 1999. The RO is characterized not merely as a typical government but as an entity that has usurped the Venezuelan state and institutions, transforming the nation into a hub for criminal activity.

Composition and Structure of the RO

The sources define the RO by the dual nature of its participants:

1. National Traitors and Collaborators: The regime is explicitly stated to be composed of national traitors and a diverse "caste of collaborators" (colaboracionistas). Collaborators, also referred to as "enchufados", include individuals from all socio-economic and cultural backgrounds who cooperate with the RO for protection, stability, improved income, or tranquility.

2. Transnational Organized Crime (COT): The RO is fundamentally entwined with the Crimen Organizado Transnacional (COT). This criminal enterprise is accused of transforming Venezuela and its institutions into a major planetary center for the production and coordination of transnational organized crime, involving large-scale money laundering, embezzlement, and treason.

3. Foreign States and Terrorist Organizations: The occupation is supported by a mix of foreign nation-states (Russia, China, Iran) and terrorist organizations (ELN, ETA, FARC, Hezbollah).

Control and Administration

The operations of the RO are alleged to be controlled and administered by a Cuban bureaucracy:

• Administrative Control: Cuban personnel are said to manage critical functions, including customs, borders, identity, passports, public property registries, tax collection, and the disposition of the entire state apparatus, including diplomatic representations and corporations like PDVSA.

• Identity Sequestration: The initial action of the Occupation was taking absolute control over the identity and nationality of Venezuelans and residents. This control is used to manipulate the Civil Registry, leading to the progressive loss of Venezuelan identity (gentilicio), and is alleged to facilitate the creation and promotion of false Venezuelan citizens through a clandestine "industry".

Methods of Control and Institutional Destruction

The existence of the RO is predicated on the systematic destruction of the state and the rule of law:

1. Institutional Facades: The initial strategy involved a series of electoral frauds in 1999 to proclaim a false "Constitution", which served as the foundation for the progressive and systematic destruction of public institutions, the state, and the rule of law. The resulting political framework consists only of institutional facades.

2. Apartheid and Population Control: The RO established a rapid system of population control to administer an "Apartheid," distributing rewards or punishments based on obedience. This includes maintaining lists of citizens based on electoral preferences (since the secrecy of the vote has disappeared) to administer access to essential services, employment, and privileges.

3. Censorship and Suppression of Liberties: Civil liberties have progressively disappeared since 1999, with free media censored, closed, or assaulted to unify information and opinion produced by the state. Independent critics and journalists are subjected to persecution, torture, and assassination for dissenting opinions, establishing censorship as the "Natural State".

4. Military and Judicial Compromise: The Venezuelan Armed Forces (FFAANN), historically the "Constitutional Police," have allegedly dishonored their command structure and been transformed into a vehicle for transnational organized crime. The judicial system is neutralized, with actors subjected to acts of terror to ensure legal processes occur outside the rule of law, exemplified by the kidnapping and torture of Judge María L. Afiuni.

Consequences and Scope

The RO is described as having orchestrated a multifaceted human rights disaster:

• Systematic Crimes: The occupation has evolved through "alternated, progressive and simultaneous stages" of Apartheid, Genocide, Displacement (Exile, Escape, Emigration, Diaspora), and Holocaust in the 21st century.

• Global Criminal Operations: The RO's actions extend beyond Venezuela's borders, utilizing its diplomatic representations and state corporations (like PDVSA) for money laundering, and interfering in the internal affairs of other nations. There are allegations that the RO is involved in a conspiracy to destroy the U.S., including installing defense systems and cooperating in a plan to flood the U.S. with cheap drugs.

In essence, the sources present the Régimen de Ocupación (RO) as a totalitarian, foreign-backed, criminal structure that has systematically dismantled Venezuela's institutions, identity, and sovereignty since 1999, maintaining its existence through institutional facades, collaboration (colaboracionismo), terror, and the administration of privileges and punishments.

Discuss Note.

The designation "New Note," which appears as a heading in the sources, refers to an extensive academic paper or ponencia prepared by Rómulo Lares Sánchez for the Cátedra “Pío Tamayo” (CPT) session scheduled for November 24, 2025,. This document serves as a comprehensive analysis of the profound crisis in Venezuela since 1999.

The core discussion points presented within this "Note" include:

1. The Central Crisis and Question

The discussion is framed around the central question: "¿La Venezuela Actual demuestra ser un pueblo satisfecho, alegre y feliz, o vive una crisis de identidad y legitimidad institucional desde

1999?"

(Does current Venezuela prove to be a satisfied, joyful, and happy people, or is it living through a crisis of identity and institutional legitimacy since 1999?). The paper aims to analyze whether satisfaction, joy, and happiness prevail or if a social and juridical crisis rooted in the changes of 1999 is present.

2. The Régime of Occupation (RO)

The ponencia documents the evolution of Venezuela since 1999, asserting that the nation has been progressively invaded and systematically destroyed, leading to its submission to a Régimen de Ocupación (RO).

• Composition: The RO is allegedly composed of national traitors and Transnational Organized Crime (COT),. It is also supported by foreign nation-states (Russia, China, Iran) and terrorist organizations (ELN, ETA, FARC, Hezbollah),.

• Institutional Destruction: The establishment of the RO was facilitated by a series of frauds in 1999 aimed at proclaiming a false "Constitution", which destroyed the legal foundation (Pacto Social) for coexistence established since the Constitution of 1811 and its subsequent editions, including the 1961 Constitution. The current framework consists only of institutional facades.

• Foreign Administration: The RO is controlled through the administration and absolute control of identity, nationality, customs, borders, and all state apparatus by Cuban bureaucracy.

3. Methods of Control and Social Consequences

The "Note" details the methods used by the RO to maintain control, arguing that civil liberties have progressively disappeared since 1999:

• Censorship and Absence of Debate: Free media has been censored, closed, or assaulted, unifying information and opinion under state control, leading to the establishment of censorship as the "Natural State".

• Apartheid System: The RO established population control to administer an "Apartheid," distributing rewards or punishments based on loyalty and obedience to official lines,. This involves using citizen lists based on electoral preferences (since voting secrecy has disappeared) to administer privileges like services, jobs, and access to foreign currency.

• Collaborationism (Colaboracionismo): The regime is sustained by a caste of collaborators from all socio-economic strata, including a sub-category known as "enchufados". This collaboration, which provides protection and privileges, aids the RO's longevity and contributes to the nation's destruction.

• Systemic Crimes: The document synthesizes the consequences of the occupation into sequential and simultaneous stages of Apartheid, Genocide, Displacement (Exile, Diaspora), and Holocaust in the 21st century.

4. Strategies for Restoration (Part II)

To address this tragedy, the second part of the "Note" promotes strategies for restoration.

• Restoring the Republic: It posits that restoring the Republic, its identity (gentilicio), and citizen freedom requires reestablishing the political course from 1999 forward, specifically restoring the legitimate Constitution of 1961.

• New Institutionalism: The goal is to build a new life proposal based on full liberty and formal, transparent, and auditable institutions.

• Inspiration from Technology and History: To guide this recovery, the discussion proposes exploring the impact of the accelerating technological revolution (Quantum Physics, AI, Big States/Mega Technological Corporations) and drawing lessons from the recent history of Spain, particularly the successful transition to democracy led by King Juan Carlos I. This Spanish example emphasizes respecting the "Constitutional Thread" ("ir de la Ley a la Ley pasando por la Ley!") to avoid fracturing historical-juridical continuity